Dear redditor what is your story from chatroulette omegle?
mStrict liability laws generally allow you to take whatever is in your hand and walk. Even though it is dark and windy, you can still walk, as long as you keep your other hand inside your jeans. Of course, you can't take your hand out of your jeans until you get to the crossing place -- which is why you see so many elderly people in pajamas, only for the crossing to take much longer than expected. This is because the young person takes much longer to cross the street than the old person, because the old person's walking shoe is broken and they cannot remember which shoe they have. The same principle applies to heavy machinery. When you see a car that is really badly hurt, you help the driver, even though you don't want to harm the driver. The reason for this is that harming another person's life is a capital crime in Germany. So harming another person's life is harming their own. This is what Stoltenberg means by common sense. I believe in the right to self-defense.
Strict liability laws protect the innocent from the guilty. This has two aspects. The first is that people can be sued for wrongful death injuries only if the other person was acting in response to imminent death or great bodily harm to another person. This means that a negligent surgeon cannot sue the homeowner for causing the death of their pet snake. (This is in contrast to American law which can be used to sue an entertainer for causing the death of an entertainer.)
The other aspect of strict liability is that injuries to one person do not have to be intentional to be actionable to a plaintiff. For example, the only time a negligent surgeon cannot be sued for wrongful death injuries to another person is if the plaintiff caused the death of another person's child as a result of negligent surgery. But even then, the plaintiff can still be protected if the plaintiff knew or should have known that the death was wrongful.
In the current law, wrongful death does not include accidental death. For example, someone who mistakenly stabs someone accidentally can be sued for the death of that person even though the person who was stabbed was not injured as a result of the negligence. Similarly, someone who cuts someone on the street can be sued for the death of that person even though the person who was attacked was not injured as a result of the negligence.
This means that someone can be sued for unlawful killings even though the person who was killed was not committing an unlawful killing. And it also means that someone can be sued for murder even though the person killed was acting in self-defense. For example, someone can be sued for killing your partner in order to kill your children. But you can be immune from liability even if the defendant killed your partner in order to kill your children.
If you're injured while shopping,